Pima vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,738,087 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.794. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 68.9 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,531, a difference of 51.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $105,430, a difference of 43.7%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,026, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,185, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,084, a difference of 19.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 118.9%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 108.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 44.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 159.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 117.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 115.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 95.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 74.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 0.61%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 84.6%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 80.7%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 72.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.9%).