Pima vs Northern European Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Northern European
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Northern Europeans
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,451
SOCIAL INDEX
82.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
71st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Northern European Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,899,334 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Northern Europeans.
Pima vs Northern European Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $47,698, a difference of 55.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $107,870, a difference of 47.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,446, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,678, a difference of 0.34%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,491, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $100,457, a difference of 21.3%).
Income Metric | Pima | Northern European |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $47,698 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $110,635 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $90,446 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $48,887 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $58,588 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Excellent $40,491 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Fair $51,678 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $100,457 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $107,870 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $64,658 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 28.3% |
Pima vs Northern European Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 167.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 123.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 37.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Northern European |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Poor 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Poor 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 28.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Pima vs Northern European Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 166.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 132.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 115.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Northern European |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Pima vs Northern European Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 12.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Northern European |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Average 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Average 82.7% |
Pima vs Northern European Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 86.1%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 68.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Northern European |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Poor 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Excellent 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Excellent 30.6% |
Pima vs Northern European Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 78.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Northern European |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Pima vs Northern European Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 80.4%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 76.5%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Northern European |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 69.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 41.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Pima vs Northern European Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 70.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.7%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Northern European |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 22.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |