Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Egypt
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Egypt

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,291
SOCIAL INDEX
80.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
79th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Egypt Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,176,902 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.664. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Immigrants from Egypt. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 32.0 Immigrants from Egypt.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Egypt Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $47,361, a difference of 54.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $109,941, a difference of 49.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $93,700, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,239, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,837, a difference of 21.3%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 23.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Egypt
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$47,361
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$111,689
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$93,700
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$50,901
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$59,925
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$42,837
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$54,239
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$103,192
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$109,941
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$64,299
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Fair
26.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 129.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 121.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 111.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 42.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 54.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Egypt
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
18.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
27.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 162.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 118.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 117.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.1%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Egypt
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Good
5.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Egypt
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 101.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 81.3%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.91%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.24, a difference of 15.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Egypt
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
28.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Egypt
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
87.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
6.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 85.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 83.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Egypt
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Fair
95.7%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Excellent
91.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Excellent
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
50.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 77.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Egypt Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Egypt
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%