Pima vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,481,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 14.7 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,909, a difference of 23.9%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,327, a difference of 23.8%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,857, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $85,553, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,841, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 100.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 99.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 148.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 131.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 112.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 51.4%), single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.0%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.96%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 73.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.80%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 47.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.0%).