Pima vs Yakama Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,598,630 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.298% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 297.5 Yakama.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $86,992, a difference of 18.6%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $72,225, a difference of 14.2%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,107, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,321, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $33,354, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 43.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 40.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.0%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 108.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 102.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 99.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 27.6%), married-couple households (35.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 113.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 64.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 40.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 67.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (45.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 30.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability (13.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.8%).