Pima vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,540,061 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.692. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.523% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 522.6 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,180, a difference of 37.7%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $98,091, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,336, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,531, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $91,668, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 136.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 109.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 108.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 23.8%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 153.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 74.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 54.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 100.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 52.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 49.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 59.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.77%).