Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Croatia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Croatia

Poor
Excellent
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,526
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
67th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Croatia Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,547,817 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Immigrants from Croatia.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Croatia Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,417, a difference of 64.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $108,304, a difference of 47.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $92,225, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,343, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,258, a difference of 22.5%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 24.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Croatia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$50,417
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$112,323
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$92,225
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$51,581
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$60,914
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$43,258
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$54,343
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$104,503
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$108,304
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$63,168
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Fair
26.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 150.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 111.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 58.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Croatia
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
17.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 158.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 127.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Croatia
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 8.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Croatia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 113.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 72.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.5%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Croatia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Excellent
47.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
29.8%

Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.40%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Croatia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
87.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
51.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
17.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 86.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 82.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Croatia
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
87.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
67.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
62.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
50.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
42.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
17.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 80.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 61.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Croatia Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Croatia
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.4%