Pima vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,678,052 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,476, a difference of 35.3%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $80,373, a difference of 27.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $91,347, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,437, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $89,748, a difference of 8.4%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 81.1%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 79.3%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.1%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 111.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 106.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 92.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 41.8%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 91.5%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 74.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 65.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 12.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 65.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 52.1%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 62.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 49.2%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.0%).