Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Middle Africa
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,547,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 17.5 Immigrants from Middle Africa.
Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,529, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $91,293, a difference of 24.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $77,559, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,254, a difference of 0.69%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,965, a difference of 7.5%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $39,529 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $93,593 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $77,559 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $43,416 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $49,201 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $37,965 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $47,916 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $82,254 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $91,293 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $58,375 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 111.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 97.8%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 28.6%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 19.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 106.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 102.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Poor 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 13.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 67.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 47.3%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 61.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 34.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 53.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 57.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 57.7%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.30%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.62%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 94.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Poor 58.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Poor 44.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Fair 36.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 60.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.7%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |