Pima vs Jordanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Jordanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Jordanians
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Jordanian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,562,419 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 62.6 Jordanians.
Pima vs Jordanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $109,376, a difference of 49.1%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,605, a difference of 48.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,794, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,796, a difference of 0.57%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,464, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $99,186, a difference of 19.8%).
Income Metric | Pima | Jordanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Excellent $45,605 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $109,865 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $91,794 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $49,632 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $58,500 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $41,464 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Fair $51,796 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $99,186 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $109,376 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $64,313 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Pima vs Jordanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 136.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 125.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 109.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 52.8%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Jordanian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Pima vs Jordanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 173.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 119.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 110.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Jordanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Average 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Good 5.3% |
Pima vs Jordanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Jordanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Fair 36.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Pima vs Jordanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 80.5%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Jordanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Pima vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 65.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 10.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Jordanian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 6.6% |
Pima vs Jordanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 78.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 77.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Jordanian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Excellent 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Excellent 96.4% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 68.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Pima vs Jordanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 74.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Jordanian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |