Pima vs Inupiat Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Inupiat
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Inupiat
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Inupiat Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,827,426 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.826. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.340% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 340.5 Inupiat.
Pima vs Inupiat Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,841, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $91,355, a difference of 24.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $61,061, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $84,619, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,935, a difference of 8.6%).
Income Metric | Pima | Inupiat |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $91,730 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $78,841 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $43,000 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $47,281 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Good $40,080 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $55,935 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $84,619 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $91,355 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Average $61,061 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 20.8% |
Pima vs Inupiat Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 72.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 64.5%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.80%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.6%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Inupiat |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 22.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 19.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 20.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 20.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Good 29.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 20.1% |
Pima vs Inupiat Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 100.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and male unemployment (8.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Inupiat |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 22.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 8.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 17.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 14.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 9.6% |
Pima vs Inupiat Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Inupiat |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 35.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 79.9% |
Pima vs Inupiat Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.1% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 21.1%), married-couple households (35.6% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and single father households (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Inupiat |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 67.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 32.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 42.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.63 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 41.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 52.1% |
Pima vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 111.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 20.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Inupiat |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 29.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 71.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 42.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 16.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Pima vs Inupiat Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.68%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Inupiat |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 54.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 47.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 25.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Pima vs Inupiat Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 249.6%), ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.0%), and female disability (14.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.6%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Inupiat |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 34.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 58.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |