Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chinese
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,955,182 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 31.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 8.8% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 62.7% | 43.0% |
| Range | 53.9% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 16.1% |
| Median | 19.2% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |