Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chinese
19.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,888,233 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 60.9%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
Minimum | 4.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 56.0% |
Range | 96.0% | 53.7% |
Mean | 20.8% | 14.3% |
Median | 17.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.1% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Inupiat (19.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Ottawa (19.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Spanish American (19.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Salvadoran (19.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.1% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.1% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.2% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.2% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.2% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |