Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
 Chinese
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chinese
6.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,787,552 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.428 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese | 
| Minimum | 0.38% | 0.26% | 
| Maximum | 11.2% | 17.0% | 
| Range | 10.8% | 16.8% | 
| Mean | 6.1% | 7.3% | 
| Median | 6.3% | 6.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 8.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Spanish (6.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (6.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Nepalese (6.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Hmong (6.6%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Scottish (6.5%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
| Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #260  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| Irish | 0.4 /100 | #261  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| English | 0.4 /100 | #262  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| Hmong | 0.3 /100 | #263  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267  | Tragic 6.6%  | 
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268  | Tragic 6.6%  |