Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chinese
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
21.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,213,293 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 18.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 31.6% | 57.9% |
| Range | 28.6% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 11.9% |
| Median | 13.0% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Slovene (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Lithuanian (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (13.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Liberians | 25.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 23.4 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 23.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.0% |
| Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
| Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
| Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
| Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
| Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
| Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |