Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chickasaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
8.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,745,653 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 41.4%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 4.1% | 15.2% |
| Range | 3.6% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.75% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.74% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Ghana (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Nigerian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Barbadians | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Portuguese | 4.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 3.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French Canadians | 3.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |