Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chickasaw
41.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,846,005 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 41.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 12.1%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 20.1% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 72.9% | 68.4% |
| Range | 52.8% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 41.9% | 48.9% |
| Median | 41.8% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.6% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.0% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Guyanese (41.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Somali (41.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Jamaican (41.4%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Liberia (41.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and West Indian (41.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 41.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 41.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |