Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chickasaw
19.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,787,777 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
![Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/child-poverty-girls-under-16/trinidadians-and-tobagonians-vs-chickasaw-child-poverty-girls-under-16-chart.webp)
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.9% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.1% | 96.2% |
Mean | 21.4% | 26.8% |
Median | 18.2% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.9% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |