Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Chickasaw
84.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
18.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,758,716 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 84.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,694,826 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 65.0% | 54.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.0% | 45.4% |
Mean | 85.3% | 80.6% |
Median | 84.9% | 79.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.6% | 73.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.5% | 85.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from West Indies (84.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Thailand (84.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Subsaharan African (84.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Dutch (84.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Canadian (84.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 23.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 84.5% |
Koreans | 23.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 84.5% |
British | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 84.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 21.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 84.5% |
Dutch | 20.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 84.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 19.1 /100 | #199 | Poor 84.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 19.0 /100 | #200 | Poor 84.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 18.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 84.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 18.1 /100 | #202 | Poor 84.5% |
Canadians | 15.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 84.4% |
Ecuadorians | 14.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.4% |
French | 13.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.4% |
Lebanese | 10.6 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.4% |
Bangladeshis | 9.4 /100 | #207 | Tragic 84.3% |
Arabs | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 84.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (82.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (82.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Puget Sound Salish (82.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |