Swedish vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,746,646 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 45.4 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,750 compared to $37,842, a difference of 20.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $52,888, a difference of 18.6%), and median family income ($108,499 compared to $91,763, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $50,852, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $42,615, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 32.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and female poverty (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 45.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and male unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 14.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 61.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 52.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 43.0%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 3.5%).