Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Swedes

Immigrants from Congo

Excellent
Fair
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Congo Integration in Swedish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,119,572 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 7.8 Immigrants from Congo.
Swedish Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,136 compared to $72,178, a difference of 37.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $77,850, a difference of 36.6%), and wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $34,317, a difference of 14.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $51,393, a difference of 22.1%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $39,169, a difference of 22.2%).
Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Income
Income MetricSwedishImmigrants from Congo
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,750
Tragic
$35,720
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,499
Tragic
$82,216
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,524
Tragic
$66,768
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,851
Tragic
$39,169
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,445
Tragic
$44,204
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,421
Tragic
$34,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Tragic
$43,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,136
Tragic
$72,178
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,377
Tragic
$77,850
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,736
Tragic
$51,393
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
21.7%

Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 69.0%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 67.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.9%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 18.9%).
Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Poverty
Poverty MetricSwedishImmigrants from Congo
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
17.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
24.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
23.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
22.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
22.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.9%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Tragic
33.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.1%

Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 48.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSwedishImmigrants from Congo
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Average
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
8.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%

Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSwedishImmigrants from Congo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.1%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.8%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
81.6%

Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 47.7%), married-couple households (49.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 27.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (64.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSwedishImmigrants from Congo
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
59.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
39.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Tragic
41.1%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
36.8%

Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.4%).
Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSwedishImmigrants from Congo
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.8%
Tragic
52.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.2%

Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 70.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.6%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Education Level
Education Level MetricSwedishImmigrants from Congo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
92.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.8%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
41.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Tragic
33.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.8%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Swedish vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
Disability MetricSwedishImmigrants from Congo
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%