Swedish vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Chickasaw
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
16.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,246,015 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 24.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 7.6% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 92.4% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 28.3% | 25.6% |
| Median | 15.6% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.3% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.5% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Swedes by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Haiti (13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Senegalese (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
| Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
| Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
| Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
| Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
| Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
| Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
| Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |
| Bermudans | 13.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 12.9 /100 | #218 | Poor 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |