Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Kiowa

Immigrants from Chile

Poor
Good
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Kiowa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,657,362 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 20.6 Immigrants from Chile.
Kiowa Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $103,412, a difference of 38.2%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $88,388, a difference of 34.1%), and per capita income ($35,102 compared to $46,213, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $52,440, a difference of 17.2%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $40,353, a difference of 18.4%).
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricKiowaImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,102
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,885
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,914
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,232
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,094
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,074
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,733
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,776
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,815
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,140
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Average
25.7%

Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (18.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 51.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 25.0%).
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricKiowaImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
16.8%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
12.2%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
18.6%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.5%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Good
11.5%

Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKiowaImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.5%

Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKiowaImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.2%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 38.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (61.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKiowaImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.1%
Good
31.2%

Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.57%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKiowaImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Poor
6.1%

Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 70.8%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 54.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 10th grade (93.9% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricKiowaImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 71.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.2%), and hearing disability (4.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 16.7%).
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricKiowaImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%