Kiowa vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Kiowa
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Kiowa
Chickasaw
75.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
76.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,396 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.314 and weighted average of 75.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 76.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 52.9% | 38.5% |
Maximum | 90.0% | 87.5% |
Range | 37.1% | 49.0% |
Mean | 70.5% | 69.2% |
Median | 71.1% | 70.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.5% | 65.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.3% | 75.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Sioux (75.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Creek (75.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Cheyenne (74.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Colville (74.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Paiute (74.7%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (76.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (76.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ottawa (76.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 76.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 76.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 76.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 76.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 76.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 76.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 76.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 75.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 75.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 75.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 75.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 75.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 75.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 75.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 75.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 75.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 74.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 74.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 74.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 74.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 73.9% |