Zimbabwean vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,159,694 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.728% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 728.2 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $34,559, a difference of 32.5%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $85,618, a difference of 28.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $86,816, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $49,989, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $39,834, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 75.9%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 54.3%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.21%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.45%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 38.8%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 94.0%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 90.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 89.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.3%).