Lithuanian vs Hopi Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Hopi
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lithuanians
Hopi
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hopi Integration in Lithuanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,314,658 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Hopi.
Lithuanian vs Hopi Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $31,177, a difference of 58.6%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $77,188, a difference of 49.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $75,562, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $46,978, a difference of 14.0%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $33,932, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $50,925, a difference of 28.1%).
Income Metric | Lithuanian | Hopi |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,448 | Tragic $31,177 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,395 | Tragic $77,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,852 | Tragic $65,043 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,991 | Tragic $36,871 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,228 | Tragic $42,060 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,108 | Tragic $33,932 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,552 | Tragic $46,978 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,223 | Tragic $75,002 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,484 | Tragic $75,562 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,209 | Tragic $50,925 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Lithuanian vs Hopi Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 123.0%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 121.7%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 25.8%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 46.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 50.9%).
Poverty Metric | Lithuanian | Hopi |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 21.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 23.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 27.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 27.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 27.9% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 27.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 28.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 18.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Lithuanian vs Hopi Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 122.3%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 116.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 116.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Lithuanian | Hopi |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 21.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 30.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 19.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Lithuanian vs Hopi Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 27.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 11.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lithuanian | Hopi |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 58.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 71.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 31.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Tragic 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 75.0% |
Lithuanian vs Hopi Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 72.0%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 55.9%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Lithuanian | Hopi |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Exceptional 3.60 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 36.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Tragic 50.8% |
Lithuanian vs Hopi Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 62.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lithuanian | Hopi |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Tragic 86.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.2% | Tragic 49.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Lithuanian vs Hopi Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 67.0%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 63.2%), and no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Education Level Metric | Lithuanian | Hopi |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 88.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.8% | Tragic 57.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 50.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 34.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Lithuanian vs Hopi Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 196.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%), male disability (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.9%).
Disability Metric | Lithuanian | Hopi |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 4.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 30.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 52.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |