Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,418,308 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 21.6 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,608 compared to $53,359, a difference of 34.7%), householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $69,774, a difference of 33.9%), and median family income ($95,402 compared to $122,764, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $55,932, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $45,323, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 82.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 44.3%), and family poverty (10.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.0%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 40.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 49.8%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 125.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 105.8%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 95.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 107.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 49.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 23.7%).