South American Indian vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,933,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 77.9 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $53,359, a difference of 20.7%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $65,518, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $122,764, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $55,932, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $69,774, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.5%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.25%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.8%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.7%).