Immigrants from Uganda vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,915,507 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to a decrease of 12.4 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $53,359, a difference of 18.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $112,228, a difference of 17.3%), and median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $65,518, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $55,932, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $45,323, a difference of 11.3%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.50%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.9%).