Immigrants from Ireland vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,574,530 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Ireland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ireland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ireland corresponds to an increase of 97.3 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($120,333 compared to $112,228, a difference of 7.2%), per capita income ($56,584 compared to $53,359, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($47,598 compared to $45,323, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,495 compared to $69,774, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,075 compared to $55,932, a difference of 2.0%), and median male earnings ($67,698 compared to $65,518, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 11.2%), male poverty (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and poverty (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.8%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.7%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and master's degree (20.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.8%).