Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Japan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Malaysia

Immigrants from Japan

Good
Exceptional
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,483
SOCIAL INDEX
92.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
15th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Japan Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,063,807 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.186% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 185.6 Immigrants from Japan.
Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Immigrants from Japan Communities

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $53,359, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $69,774, a difference of 6.5%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $55,932, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $45,323, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $112,228, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaImmigrants from Japan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,983
Exceptional
$53,359
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,880
Exceptional
$122,764
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,292
Exceptional
$100,711
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,514
Exceptional
$54,938
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,121
Exceptional
$65,518
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,835
Exceptional
$45,323
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,179
Exceptional
$55,932
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,650
Exceptional
$112,228
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,796
Exceptional
$118,498
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,497
Exceptional
$69,774
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.9%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.89%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaImmigrants from Japan
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
13.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
13.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
18.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.0%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaImmigrants from Japan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaImmigrants from Japan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.3%
Tragic
34.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.94%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaImmigrants from Japan
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Exceptional
47.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
26.4%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaImmigrants from Japan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.5%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.7%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.3%
Fair
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Average
6.3%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.0%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaImmigrants from Japan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.3%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.5%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Exceptional
46.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.8%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.6%), male disability (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.16%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.70%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Japan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaImmigrants from Japan
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%