Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,202,981 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 47.9%), per capita income ($38,766 compared to $53,359, a difference of 37.6%), and median family income ($89,268 compared to $122,764, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $55,932, a difference of 9.6%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $45,323, a difference of 17.3%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $54,938, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 87.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 53.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.5%), single father poverty (17.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.1%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.2%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 29.7%), and no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 103.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 78.4%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%).