Creek vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,805,485 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $53,359, a difference of 50.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $118,498, a difference of 50.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $112,228, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $55,932, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $69,774, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 75.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 65.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 42.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and family households (64.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 106.8%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 105.5%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 90.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 77.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.2%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.6%).