Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,603,247 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($65,329 compared to $43,266, a difference of 51.0%), wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,201 compared to $77,850, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,159 compared to $34,317, a difference of 14.1%), median earnings ($48,304 compared to $39,169, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,108 compared to $51,393, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (13.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 79.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 76.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 71.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 64.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 68.7%), births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 67.4%), and married-couple households (51.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (68.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 44.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.1%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.66%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.2%).