French American Indian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,405,882 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.388. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 37.1 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $72,178, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $77,850, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $51,393, a difference of 6.4%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $34,317, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($43,333 compared to $39,169, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother poverty (33.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (24.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.1%), married-couple households (44.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.28%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and high school diploma (88.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (42.0% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.0%).