Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,177,967 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.810. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 52.0 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $35,720, a difference of 55.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $72,178, a difference of 55.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,318 compared to $77,850, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $43,266, a difference of 23.9%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 29.5%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $34,317, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 59.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 57.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 51.4%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (62.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.81%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 83.9%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 79.7%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 34.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.14%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.9%).