Crow vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,656,090 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 55.7 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.8%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $35,720, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $43,266, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $72,178, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $39,169, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $34,317, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 96.8%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 67.7%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.4%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (26.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 274.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 267.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 231.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 39.0%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.23, a difference of 18.4%), and family households (65.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.18%), currently married (40.4% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.8%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.83%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.7%).