Lumbee vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,861,817 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 35.1 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $51,393, a difference of 26.7%), householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $43,266, a difference of 25.1%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $66,768, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $34,317, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $44,204, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (28.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 85.1%), single male poverty (25.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 81.3%), and receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 26.4%), single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 100.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 75.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 34.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 31.0%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (39.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 67.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.9%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 48.0%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.48%), 10th grade (91.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.9%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 46.5%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.90%), cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.5%).