Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,688,640 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.339% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 338.9 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $72,178, a difference of 49.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $77,850, a difference of 44.9%), and median household income ($96,292 compared to $66,768, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $43,266, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $51,393, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 53.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.4%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 34.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 35.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.8%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 56.8%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.0%).