Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,226,840 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.561. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 45.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $54,000, a difference of 10.8%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $60,748, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,202, a difference of 0.46%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $43,750, a difference of 0.57%), and per capita income ($39,827 compared to $39,558, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.23%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 89.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 72.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 31.0%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 44.6%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.37, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 67.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.66%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 113.3%), bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 160.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.0%).