French vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,629,717 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.962% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 962.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 17.4%), median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $49,711, a difference of 11.3%), and per capita income ($43,685 compared to $39,558, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $38,202, a difference of 0.67%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($83,468 compared to $79,509, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.40%), single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 62.0%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 60.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 133.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.5%), bachelor's degree (36.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 74.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 28.1%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%).