Immigrants from Western Africa vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,935,039 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Western Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Africa corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($49,621 compared to $54,000, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,119 compared to $60,748, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($79,490 compared to $79,509, a difference of 0.020%), median family income ($94,638 compared to $95,573, a difference of 0.99%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,384 compared to $93,991, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.6%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.42%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 55.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 50.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 43.0%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.37, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (63.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.4% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.8%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.1%), and bachelor's degree (36.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 135.6%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 71.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.9%).