Welsh vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,535,642 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Welsh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.788. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Welsh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Welsh corresponds to an increase of 166.3 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Welsh and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($54,647 compared to $49,711, a difference of 9.9%), and per capita income ($43,233 compared to $39,558, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,666 compared to $60,748, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($37,856 compared to $38,202, a difference of 0.91%), and median earnings ($45,710 compared to $43,750, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Welsh and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Welsh and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 66.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 66.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Welsh and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Welsh and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.74%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (48.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 143.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Welsh and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.6%), bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 80.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.87%), disability (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%).