Icelander vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,767,225 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.498% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 497.6 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $39,558, a difference of 13.7%), wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $49,711, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $60,748, a difference of 0.86%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $38,202, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $54,000, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 48.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 108.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 63.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.3%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.9%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 80.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.60%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.5%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 38.2%), and bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.19%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 143.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.37%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%).