Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,831,854 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 9.3 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $88,018, a difference of 45.6%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $39,558, a difference of 43.4%), and median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $49,711, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $54,000, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $60,748, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 71.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 61.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 91.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 68.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 91.2%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 62.4%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 53.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 92.7%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 85.1%), and no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 83.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.36%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and 11th grade (92.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 210.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 76.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.6%).