Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,754,660 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.772. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.363% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 362.8 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $39,558, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $49,711, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $88,018, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $54,000, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $60,748, a difference of 3.2%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 44.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 39.9%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.42%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 66.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 59.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 75.9%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 38.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.1%), no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 51.5%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 148.0%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.6%).