Chippewa vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,389,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,000, a difference of 14.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $60,748, a difference of 12.8%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $79,509, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $49,711, a difference of 7.2%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,558, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 24.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 54.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 45.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.8%), currently married (43.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 84.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.0%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and male disability (14.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.2%).