Immigrants from Philippines vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,244,166 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.935. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 19.0 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,000 compared to $54,202, a difference of 23.2%), median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $63,382, a difference of 13.6%), and median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $46,556, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($93,899 compared to $95,098, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $112,008, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 21.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.13%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.11, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 103.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 93.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 67.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 68.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 52.2%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.2%).