Zimbabwean vs Macedonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,408,746 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 22.3 Macedonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,564, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,563, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,618 compared to $90,761, a difference of 0.16%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $107,074, a difference of 0.21%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $109,668, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.49%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.53%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.6%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%).