Chickasaw vs Macedonian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Macedonian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Macedonians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Macedonian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,295,096 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 77.1 Macedonians.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9693a/9693a7eb2cf1c8dca92569c4c6aeea4a02466380" alt="Chickasaw Integration in Macedonian Communities"
Chickasaw vs Macedonian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $101,882, a difference of 30.7%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,573, a difference of 30.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $107,074, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,564, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,286, a difference of 20.0%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea572/ea5721b8250ba1f4404b5ceaf82a2e2056185966" alt="Chickasaw vs Macedonian Income"
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Macedonian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $47,573 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $109,668 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $90,761 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,893 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $59,522 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,286 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $101,882 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $107,074 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,564 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.6% |
Chickasaw vs Macedonian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.5%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.7%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.5%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a003/0a003f8cc1ef4f0fad55cc89e2d916041f24d301" alt="Chickasaw vs Macedonian Poverty"
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Macedonian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chickasaw vs Macedonian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/253ac/253ac2b3fe3b62168a8fe5c95d0cf89cbe6d7a27" alt="Chickasaw vs Macedonian Unemployment"
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Macedonian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Macedonian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6599d/6599d3ac889fad1645d7733f9190c7a1d67e2e49" alt="Chickasaw vs Macedonian Labor Participation"
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Macedonian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 37.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Chickasaw vs Macedonian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f648b/f648b345c4b22c71dd0ce68622c45528f5122395" alt="Chickasaw vs Macedonian Family Structure"
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Macedonian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Chickasaw vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 54.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 25.3%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb167/fb167d477b8148d626272cc3e4bb8e62f96033a9" alt="Chickasaw vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability"
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Macedonian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Macedonian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.2%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d520a/d520a73952098189062de114fb693ac4be10b24b" alt="Chickasaw vs Macedonian Education Level"
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Macedonian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 49.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 41.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Macedonian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 54.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3842a/3842ae81aff0e8e02a62497d336b5a7ea53c6fa7" alt="Chickasaw vs Macedonian Disability"
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Macedonian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Fair 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |